R v Wang [2005] HL

Friday 11 February 2005 at 9:52 pm | In News | 1 Comment

[Juries – verdict – there are no circumstances in which a judge is entitled to direct a jury to return a verdict of guilty]
D a Buddhist had a sword and a knife in his bag; it was stolen at an Essex railway station. As a Buddhist D practised Shaolin, a traditional martial art requiring the use of the knife. The judge at Chelmsford Crown Court could not see that the defendant had a defence and directed the jury to find him guilty on two counts of having an article with a blade or point in a public place.

Held: There are no circumstances in which a judge is entitled to direct a jury to return a verdict of guilty.

Not guilty.
Full report here.

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Interesting why the Public Prosecutor would even want to pursue a case like this. Only serves to cause angst and not to mention expensive legal costs for the defendant.

    Comment by Chui Tey — Saturday 12 February 2005 11:32 am #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^