{"id":153,"date":"2005-01-08T15:37:46","date_gmt":"2005-01-08T15:37:46","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2005-01-08T15:37:46","modified_gmt":"2005-01-08T15:37:46","slug":"r-v-richardson-2004-ca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/?p=153","title":{"rendered":"R v Richardson, [2004] CA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>[Juries &#8211; disqualified juror does not on its own render conviction unsafe]<\/strong><br \/>D was convicted by a jury consisting of a disqualified juror &#8211; disqualified (<strong>s1 and SchI Juries Act 1974<\/strong>) because of a conviction for sex offences &#8211; of six counts of rape and one count of indecent assault. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Held<\/strong>: A conviction was not unsafe due to the fact that a juror who was disqualified from acting did so act. There must either be some evidence that the verdict is unsafe. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Guilty<\/strong> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Juries &#8211; disqualified juror does not on its own render conviction unsafe]D was convicted by a jury consisting of a disqualified juror &#8211; disqualified (s1 and SchI Juries Act 1974) because of a conviction for sex offences &#8211; of six counts of rape and one count of indecent assault. Held: A conviction was not unsafe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sixthform.info\/lawblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}